Putting The Farm Bill To Work
> California > Tree
Fruit and Nut Growers
LEARNING
CURVE
Conservationists, consultants and growers find new
opportunities
for sound farming practices
by
David Turner
California
tree fruit and nut growers in the Sacramento Valley are finding
that their participation in federal conservation programs is enabling
them to increase their use of farming practices that conserve natural
resources and improve their operations.
Through a cooperative
project of the Center for Agricultural Partnerships (CAP), Almond
Board of California, Del Monte Foods, the Dried Plum Board and Diamond
Walnut, growers are gaining insights on how to most effectively
use the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) administered
by USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) to support
their conservation efforts.
The cooperative
project created user-friendly information about EQIP and distributed
it to almond, walnut, peach and dried plum growers throughout the
Valley. The materials explained the advantages of how to apply.
Additionally,
CAP hired PCAs in the Valley to help growers overcome significant
challenges in the planning and application process. The consultants
helped growers apply for EQIP funding and will eventually implement
conservation practices upon application approval. Consultant John
Post of Agricultural Advisors, Inc., works primarily with almond,
peach and walnut growers north of Sacramento. Randy Hansen consults
with apple and pear growers in El Dorado County and the Sacramento-San
Joaquin Delta region. Barry Wilk and Cliff Kitayama of Scientific
Methods work with nut and fruit growers in primarily Yuba, Butte
and Sutter counties.
IPM
is priority
The use of integrated pest management practices is a priority for
EQIP in fruit and nut growing areas.
“What’s
nice about EQIP is that it cost-shares to help growers try new things
that are cost-prohibitive such as pheromones for mating disruption
or biological nematicides for nematode control,” said Post.
“And the best thing is that they’re talking to fee-based
consultants like us, not sales people who are tied to certain products,
so they can have confidence they’re getting unbiased advice.”
NRCS in California
has said a successful application process will include integrated
pest management practices.
“There
are multiple measures and things growers can do to get a high score
and ultimately get selected to participate in EQIP,” said
Ernie Paschke, District Conservationist for the Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS) of the USDA. “The chances of being
approved are slim if you’re just doing one measure,”
he said. “The consultants like John help growers achieve good
conservation management in many inter-related ways.”
Flexibility
praised
Post sees flexibility as one of EQIP’s biggest plusses. One
of the program’s objectives is to raise awareness among growers
about how to achieve conservation management and that funding is
available. “It gives you some latitude,” said Post.
“It’s not our way or the highway. If you have a problem
that can only be dealt with using harsh means, they’ll let
you do it. The point is to try softer methods if appropriate.”
Paschke agrees,
particularly when it comes to covering costs on consultation. “Our
intent is to cost-share environmentally friendly methods that replace
more toxic chemicals,” said Paschke. “So it was a natural
step to use EQIP dollars to have outside consultants help growers
and landowners move in that direction. It’s an effective use
of the money,” he said.
Obstacles
overcome
That philosophy has helped growers overcome any reluctance to get
involved in a government program. Since EQIP is a voluntary program,
growers can choose the practices they want to use. While they must
still wade through paperwork, officials and consultants have been
successful in making the process easier for growers.
“There
are too many obstacles and too much paperwork involved, but CAP
Executive Director Larry Elworth and his organization have helped
streamline the process,” said Post.
Doug and Cathy
Hemly of Greene and Hemly, who grow apples and pears in the Sacramento
Delta, made application to EQIP this year. Paperwork and skepticism
about dealing with the government were impediments, but they were
overcome with the help of consultant Randy Hansen, NRCS staff and
CAP.
“Getting
into the system was very time consuming. It’s a pretty big
hurdle to get over given the paperwork you have to get together
to explain your program. We started out at the bottom run of the
knowledge ladder and we’re still on the steep learning curve,”
said Doug Hemly of Greene and Hemly. “But I have been very
impressed with the people we’ve interacted with and the breadth
and knowledge and the grasp, spirit and ability to implement,”
he said.
Multifaceted
program
As recommended, Greene and Hemly’s program is multi-faceted.
It includes irrigation components, bat and owl houses for pest control,
an agrichemical loading station, gravel-based dust control, and
a green manure pilot project for fertilization. What’s more,
the grower plans to place filter strips along ditch banks to impede
draining. The company also desires to put in buffer trees to control
dust, overspray and wind damage.
“I really
think it’s a step in the right direction,” said Hemly.
“The biggest thing was understanding what’s available
and overcoming the fear of dealing with another government program,”
he said. “All bureaucracies are intimidating until you understand
them. Toward that end we’ve found that working with CAP, our
consultant and the county people very beneficial.”
Starting
early
Last year, Hansen learned about EQIP two weeks before the application
deadline and this was not enough time to help growers apply. This
year he worked with growers six months ahead of time.
“I got
people thinking about it and told them I could help with the application,”
said Hansen, who found that most growers were nervous about getting
involved because they were intimidated by the application process
and the idea of having the government more involved in their businesses.
But growers were pleased to see that by applying they received a
consultation from the NRCS. This gave them ideas on measures they
hadn’t thought about. “Those consultations have always
been available, but before we got them thinking about EQIP many
didn’t know about them or take advantage of them,” he
said.
Talking
and learning
Hansen noted that in working with six different NRCS offices in
the region, he found different interpretations of procedure. He
helped the offices communicate with one another and tie resources
to need. “It helped NRCS staff to know that there was someone
else out there dealing with these issues. They could talk to each
other and get more comfortable.”
In the county where Hansen works most of the time, the rate of grower
contract approval into EQIP is about 33 percent. In working through
the process with growers like Greene and Hemly, he has learned from
what was successful and what wasn’t. “Next year, I can
help growers focus on problem areas and improve our approval rate.”
Going
for CSP
As an added benefit, Greene and Hemly found that its work preparing
for the EQIP application is helping them qualify for another program
— the Conservation Security Program (CSP). The program was
established by the 2002 Farm Bill to reward and sustain exceptional
conservation efforts by farmers.
One reason
they applied for CSP is that it provides longer-term support (up
to 10 years) than EQIP. However, CSP’s application process
is much more complicated, and the competition for contract approval
is more intense since all applications go to Washington for review
and selection. Even so, the prospect of being awarded a long-term
contract, and the fact that CSP may not be offered in his area again
for several years, made it attractive to Greene and Hemly.
“CSP
wasn’t available when we wrote the EQIP application. If we’re
accepted into CSP, we hope to recoup some of the money we spent
doing our own R&D for conservation programs such as IPM,”
said Cathy Hemly, who was directly involved with the application
process for both programs. “And, under the CSP we have identified
other possible projects such as insectary plantings and enhancements
of wildlife habitats.”
In July Hemly
and Greene was notified that it was one of ranches in California
that was awarded a CSP contract. In announcing the Contract in California,
NRCS Acting State Conservationist Allen Green said, "All of
these successful CSP applicants are model conservationists. They
have invested in conservation for years by protecting soil and water
quality. Based on their conservation leadership on private lands
in California, over $6 million from CSP will help local economies
in these watersheds."
|